Dr. Jennifer W. Shewmaker

Parent, Teacher, Author

Podcast Gender and Media Talk: Boy Builders and Pink Princesses

Today’s podcast in Gender and Media Talk focuses on the research of Dr. Elizabeth Sweet, who studies gendered toy packaging and how it both effects and reflects gender roles in society. This podcast was recorded on April 3, 2015.

If you watch Saturday morning commercials or other advertisements directed toward children, you’ll see a very gendered approach to marketing toys. Even in toy stores, toys are clearly delineated into blue and pink sections.


What about toys that both boys and girls like to play with, like LEGO, Lincoln Logs, and other building and craft making equipment? These toys are often in the boy aisle. When we do see those products in the “girl” section, they are marketed in a distinctly different way.

For example, consider the LEGO Friends Line. In this article in Bloomberg Businessweek, it is clear that LEGO has done exhaustive work trying to understand what has kept girls from playing with them before and what would make LEGO more attractive to girls. As my friend, Michele, from Princess Free Zone made clear in her excellent post on this topic, perhaps girls don’t see LEGO as attractive because since 2005, as stated in the Business Week article, the company has been aiming straight at boys.

But this type of gendered marketing is fairly new. As this LEGO ad from the 80’s shows, the company promoted the product to both girls and boys as fun building sets.

In an article interviewing the woman who appeared in this LEGO ad in 1981, she stated,

“In 1981, LEGOs were simple and gender-neutral, and the creativity of the child produced the message,” Giordano told her. ” In 2014, it’s the reverse: the toy delivers a message to the child, and this message is weirdly about gender.”

But now, as Dr. Sweet says in her recent article in The Atlantic,

Many who embrace the new (gendered) status quo in toys claim that gender-neutrality would be synonymous with taking away choice, in essence forcing children to become androgynous automatons who can only play with boring tan objects.  However, as the bright palette and diverse themes found among toys from the ‘70s demonstrates, decoupling them from gender actually widens the range of options available. It opens up the possibility that children can explore and develop their diverse interests and skills, unconstrained by the dictates of gender stereotypes.”

I hope you’ll enjoy hearing her expand on her study of how toy ads have changed, what she thinks that means for children today, and some strategies for responding to gendered advertisements.

3 comments on “Podcast Gender and Media Talk: Boy Builders and Pink Princesses

  1. Joycelyn Li
    February 25, 2016

    I was wondering what is the catalog that was mentioned in the podcast? Thank you!

  2. Pingback: Pink and Blue Toy Aisles: Part 4 – Have toy ads and packaging changed? | Dr. Jennifer W. Shewmaker

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on April 11, 2015 by in Podcasts: Gender and Media Talk and tagged , , , , .
Follow Dr. Jennifer W. Shewmaker on WordPress.com

Twitter Updates

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,508 other followers


%d bloggers like this: