Dr. Jennifer W. Shewmaker

Parent, Teacher, Author

Pink and Blue Toy Aisles Part 5: What can we do?

girl_boy_playing_house

In this series we’ve been talking about how media and marketing depictions impact children. Research has shown us that there are patterns of how girls and boys are depicted, and that when children consistently see these patterns, they begin to believe them.

But guess what else research has shown? When both boys and girls are depicted as playing with the same toy in a commercial, children are more likely to later identify that toy as being “for boys and girls” (Pike & Jennings, 2005).

In fact, advertising research has suggested that instead of developing two different sets of advertisements for boys and girls, advertisers can more effectively appeal to preadolescent boys and girls by choosing themes that either focus on agency or community.

Preadolescent boys and girls are both interested in the idea of promoting agency though acting independently and in building community and relationships. By the age of eight, girls actually begin to show more favorable toward advertisements that promote agency (Bakir, Blodgett, & Rose, 2008).

So here are the questions that I have as I think about what we’ve learned in this series:

Why don’t we see more advertisements that depict boys and girls playing together?

Why don’t we see more commercials that promote agency for girls and community for boys, since we know that those can be effective as well?

Some have suggested that it’s because segmenting the market is more profitable (Johnson & Young, 2002). If I can sell two different sets of the same toy to one household because the parents think they must have different ones for their son and daughter, then I make more money!

But the thing is, this type of advertising also promotes stereotypes that feed into these destructive and unhealthy ideas:

  • That girls are less capable of acting on their own behalf as agents,
  • That girls are less interested in activities that tend to lead to interest in STEM fields,
  • That boys are not interested in relationship and community, and
  • That people of different sexes should not play and in the long-term work together.

None of these ideas are healthy, effective ways of helping children develop into strong men and women. Parents and other caring adults need to understand this so that they can begin to use their buying power to pressure companies to produce something different. That’s where change will come, but it all starts with parental awareness.

When most parents list the characteristics that they hope to see in their child as they grow, they include things like compassion, integrity, leadership, and strong character for children of both genders. In order to produce those things, we must become more aware of the messages that our children are absorbing. We must become critical consumers and help our children learn to do the same so that their ideas of what it means to be a boy or a girl are shaped thoughtfully, and so that whatever their talents, our children learn to envision a way to use them to make this world a better place.

That’s why we need to get rid of the pink and blue toy aisles. To help our children grow and learn and fully develop their strengths, we don’t need to tell them what they should look according to their gender, we need to give them the chance to creatively explore the world to discover what they like. Otherwise, how will we nurture the next Marie Curie? The next Fred Rogers? It’s time for us to put away our preconceptions about who our children MUST be due to their gender and find out who they really are.

Hilliard, L.J. & Liben, L.S. (2010). Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: Effects on children’s gender attitudes and intergroup bias. Child Development, 81, 1787-1798.

Johnson, F.L. & Young, K. (2002). Gendered voices in children’s television advertising. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 461-480.

Kahlenberg, S.G. & Hein, M.M. (2010). Progression on Nickelodeon? Gender-role stereotypes in toy commercials. Sex Roles, 62, 830-847.

Miller, C.F., Lurye, L.E., Zosuls, K.M., & Ruble, D.N. (2009). Accessibility of gender stereotype domains: Developmental and gender differences in children. Sex Roles, 60, 870-881.

Pike, J.J. & Jennings, N.A. (2005). The effects of commercials on children’s perceptions of gender appropriate toy use. Sex Roles, 52, 83-91.

Advertisements

One comment on “Pink and Blue Toy Aisles Part 5: What can we do?

  1. Cherisse Flanagan
    August 14, 2015

    I applaud that you are promoting doable suggestions that are backed by research.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on August 14, 2015 by in Acting and tagged , , , .
Follow Dr. Jennifer W. Shewmaker on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,568 other followers

Categories

%d bloggers like this: